Quick Home Search

LoginRegister to Get Homes by Email

FTC ruling to protect struggling home owners from mortgage relief scams

Fraud 150x150 FTC ruling to protect struggling home owners from mortgage relief scamsHomeowners are protected by a Federal Trade Commission rule that bans providers of mortgage foreclosure rescue and loan modification services from collecting fees until an acceptable written offer has been received from their lender or loan servicer.  It also includes a few other important requirements and prohibitions.

“At a time when many Americans are struggling to pay their mortgages, peddlers of so-called mortgage relief services have taken hundreds of millions of dollars from hundreds of thousands of homeowners without ever delivering results,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said. “By banning providers of these services from collecting fees until the customer is satisfied with the results, this rule will protect consumers from being victimized by these scams.” After all, since they cannot make money for nothing, those whose intent is only to defraud the public will vanish from the industry.

The FTC issued the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) Rule to protect distressed homeowners from scam artists who have sprung up during the mortgage crisis. This despicable operations falsely claim that, for a fee, they will negotiate with the consumer’s mortgage lender or servicer to obtain a loan modification, a short sale, or other relief from foreclosure. Many of these operations pretend to be affiliated with the government and government housing assistance programs. The FTC has brought more than 30 cases against operations like these, and state and federal law enforcement partners have brought hundreds more.

Advance fee ban

The most significant consumer protection under the FTC’s rule is the advance fee ban. Under this provision, mortgage relief companies may not collect any fees until they have provided consumers with a written offer from their lender or servicer that the consumer decides is acceptable, and a written document from the lender or Mortgage Fraud 150x150 FTC ruling to protect struggling home owners from mortgage relief scamsservicer describing the key changes to the mortgage that would result if the consumer accepts the offer. The companies also must remind consumers of their right to reject the offer without any charge.

Disclosures

The Rule requires mortgage relief companies, sometimes called dept assistance programs, mortgage modification program counselors and the like, to disclose key information to consumers to protect them from being misled and to help them make better informed decisions. In their advertising and in communications directed at individual consumers (such as telemarketing calls), the companies must disclose that:

  • they are not associated with the government, and their services have not been approved by the government or the consumer’s lender;
  • the lender may not agree to change the consumer’s loan; and
  • if companies tell consumers to stop paying their mortgage, they must also tell them that they could lose their home and damage their credit rating.

Companies also must explain in their communications to consumers that they can stop doing business with the company at any time, can accept or reject any offer the company obtains from the lender or servicer, and, if they reject the offer, they don’t have to pay the company’s fee. The companies also must disclose the amount of the fee.

Prohibited claims

The MARS Rule prohibits mortgage relief companies from making any false or misleading claims about their services, including claims about:

  1. the likelihood of consumers getting the results they seek;
  2. the company’s affiliation with government or private entities;
  3. the consumer’s payment and other mortgage obligations;
  4. the company’s refund and cancellation policies;
  5. whether the company has performed the services it promised;
  6. whether the company will provide legal representation to consumers;
  7. the availability or cost of any alternative to for-profit mortgage assistance relief services;
  8. the amount of money a consumer will save by using their services; or
  9. the cost of the services.
Be sure to check out #5.  This should be commonsense, but it’s not.  Many distressed homeowners are so rattled by their predicaments, that they will try anything if they think they can save their home.  Any company should be able to prove their success rate.  The sad fact is that most of these fraudulent companies haven’t helped ONE person…but they’ve taken money from many.

In addition, the rule bars mortgage relief companies from telling consumers to stop communicating with their lenders or servicers. Companies also must have reliable evidence to back up any claims they make about the benefits, performance, or effectiveness of the services they provide.

Attorney exemption

Attorneys are generally exempt from the rule if they meet three conditions: they are engaged in the practice of law, they are licensed in the state where the consumer or the dwelling is located, and they are complying with state laws and regulations governing attorney conduct related to the rule. To be exempt from the advance fee ban, attorneys must meet a fourth requirement – they must place any fees they collect in a client trust account and abide by state laws and regulations covering such accounts.

Just to be clear, I have not found a lot of attorneys who truly understand all of the options for distressed homeowners.  Here is where I will put in my shameless plug for those in my geographic area.  The people most knowledgeable about the options are real estate agents who are Certified Distressed Property Experts (CDPE).  We are kept up to date on the ever-changing laws and rulings concerning distressed properties.  If you’re not in my area, I can help you find a CDPE/Colleague in any part of the country.  Banks also tend to approve more transactions when a CDPE is involved, due to our competence.  I am the willing recipient of referrals from the distressed property divisions at two major banks in my area.

The bulk of the ruling went into effect in December, 2010.  The Advance Fee ban went into effect Junaury, 2011.  The FTC rulemaking proceeding was conducted pursuant to Congressional legislation sponsored in 2009 by SenatorsJay Rockefeller and Byron Dorgan. The Final Rule applies only to entities within the FTC’s jurisdiction under the Federal Trade Commission Act, which excludes, among others, banks, savings and loans, federal credit unions, common carriers, and entities engaged in the business of insurance. In June 2009, the FTC issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on the practices of for-profit mortgage relief companies. In February 2010, the FTC announced a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and sought comments from interested persons, including advocates for consumers, the business community, and the legal profession.

Click here for facts about mortgage consumers’ rights.Scam caution FTC ruling to protect struggling home owners from mortgage relief scams

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them.  To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357).  The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.  The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

STAFF CONTACT:
Laura Sullivan or Evan Zullow
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3224
About John R. Wuertz